Introduction
Choosing the right database is one of the most important decisions in application architecture. The database you select affects performance, scalability, development speed, and operational complexity. This guide compares the three most popular open-source databases and provides guidance for selecting the right database for your use case.
Database Comparison: Quick Overview
| Aspect | PostgreSQL | MySQL | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Relational (SQL) | Relational (SQL) | Document NoSQL |
| Data Model | Structured tables | Structured tables | JSON documents |
| ACID Compliance | Yes, full ACID | Yes (InnoDB) | Partial (4.0+) |
| Scalability | Vertical scaling | Vertical scaling | Horizontal scaling |
| Query Language | SQL | SQL | JavaScript/Query |
| Best For | Complex queries | Web applications | Flexible schema |
PostgreSQL: The Powerful Open-Source Database
Overview
PostgreSQL is a mature, feature-rich relational database known for reliability, advanced features, and SQL compliance. It excels at complex queries and large datasets.
Key Features
- Full ACID compliance for data reliability
- Advanced SQL features (window functions, CTEs, JSON support)
- Excellent for complex queries across relationships
- Powerful extensions (PostGIS, HStore, UUID)
- Strong data types and constraints
- Built-in replication and backup
Use Cases
- Financial systems and banking applications
- Complex business logic with many relationships
- Data warehouses and analytics
- Geographic information systems (GIS)
- Applications requiring strict ACID guarantees
Example: PostgreSQL Setup
# Install on Ubuntu
sudo apt-get install postgresql postgresql-contrib
# Create database
sudo -u postgres createdb myapp
# Create user
sudo -u postgres createuser -P myuser
# Connect
psql -U myuser -d myapp
# Example schema with relationships
CREATE TABLE users (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE TABLE posts (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
user_id INTEGER REFERENCES users(id),
title VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
content TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
-- Complex query with relationships
SELECT users.email, COUNT(posts.id) as post_count
FROM users
LEFT JOIN posts ON users.id = posts.user_id
GROUP BY users.id, users.email
ORDER BY post_count DESC;
Advantages
- Most advanced open-source database
- Excellent for complex queries
- Full ACID compliance
- Strong data integrity guarantees
- Powerful extensions
- Excellent documentation
Limitations
- Vertical scaling only (scale up, not out)
- Steeper learning curve than MySQL
- Higher memory and CPU usage
- Slower writes compared to MySQL in some scenarios
MySQL: The Popular Web Database
Overview
MySQL is the most popular open-source relational database, known for simplicity, speed, and widespread hosting support. The default database for WordPress, Drupal, and countless web applications.
Key Features
- Simple to install and configure
- Fast query execution
- Wide hosting support (shared hosting, cloud)
- Full-text search capabilities
- Replication support
- InnoDB provides ACID compliance and transactions
Use Cases
- Content management systems (WordPress, Drupal)
- Web applications and e-commerce
- Social media platforms
- Real-time analytics
- Mobile application backends
Example: MySQL Setup
# Install on Ubuntu
sudo apt-get install mysql-server
# Secure installation
sudo mysql_secure_installation
# Create database and user
mysql -u root -p
CREATE DATABASE myapp;
CREATE USER 'appuser'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY 'password';
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON myapp.* TO 'appuser'@'localhost';
FLUSH PRIVILEGES;
# Example schema
CREATE TABLE users (
id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
password_hash VARCHAR(255),
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
CREATE TABLE posts (
id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
user_id INT NOT NULL,
title VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
content LONGTEXT,
FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES users(id),
INDEX idx_user (user_id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
Advantages
- Simple setup and configuration
- Extremely fast for read-heavy workloads
- Widely supported hosting
- Good for web applications
- InnoDB ACID compliance
- Easy replication setup
Limitations
- Limited advanced features compared to PostgreSQL
- Not ideal for complex queries
- Scaling requires replication complexity
- Less powerful join optimization
- String functions less comprehensive
MongoDB: The Flexible NoSQL Database
Overview
MongoDB is a document database storing data as JSON-like documents rather than tables. Designed for flexible schemas and horizontal scaling.
Key Features
- Flexible schema—change data structure without migrations
- Horizontal scalability through sharding
- JSON-like document storage
- Powerful aggregation framework
- ACID transactions (MongoDB 4.0+)
- Full-text search capabilities
Use Cases
- Applications with evolving data schemas
- Content management with varying structures
- Real-time big data applications
- Internet of Things (IoT) data
- User profiles with many optional fields
- Catalog applications (e-commerce)
Example: MongoDB Setup
# Install on Ubuntu
sudo apt-get install mongodb
# Start MongoDB service
sudo systemctl start mongodb
# Connect to MongoDB
mongo
# Create database and collection
use myapp
# Insert document (flexible schema)
db.users.insertOne({
email: "user@example.com",
profile: {
firstName: "John",
lastName: "Doe",
age: 30
},
preferences: {
notifications: true,
theme: "dark"
},
createdAt: new Date()
})
# Query documents
db.users.find({ "profile.age": { : 25 } })
# Aggregation pipeline
db.posts.aggregate([
{ : { status: "published" } },
{ : { _id: "", count: { : 1 } } },
{ : { count: -1 } }
])
Advantages
- Flexible schema
- Horizontal scaling through sharding
- Fast writes
- Developer-friendly JSON structure
- Powerful aggregation framework
- Good for unstructured data
Limitations
- Memory usage higher than SQL databases
- Less mature transaction support (improving)
- Joins more complex (no foreign keys)
- Eventual consistency challenges
- Sharding adds operational complexity
- Requires different programming paradigm
Decision Matrix: Choosing the Right Database
Choose PostgreSQL If:
- Complex queries across relationships
- Data integrity is critical
- Advanced SQL features needed
- Financial or sensitive data
- Reporting and analytics focus
- Large complex datasets
Choose MySQL If:
- Web application or CMS
- Rapid development needed
- Simple schema with relationships
- Read-heavy workload
- Shared hosting environment
- Familiar with SQL needed
Choose MongoDB If:
- Flexible/evolving schema
- Horizontal scaling required
- JSON-friendly data structure
- Rapid prototyping
- High-volume writes
- Unstructured or semi-structured data
Performance Characteristics
Read Performance
- MySQL: Fastest for simple lookups
- PostgreSQL: Fastest for complex queries
- MongoDB: Fast for single document lookups
Write Performance
- MongoDB: Fastest writes
- MySQL: Fast writes
- PostgreSQL: Slightly slower writes (more validation)
Scalability
- MongoDB: Horizontal scaling (sharding)
- MySQL: Replication, read replicas
- PostgreSQL: Replication, read replicas
Recommendation Summary
For most web applications: Start with MySQL. Simple, reliable, and widely supported. Migrate to PostgreSQL if advanced features needed.
For complex business logic: PostgreSQL from the start. Advanced features save development time.
For flexible/scalable applications: MongoDB if horizontal scaling is critical and schema flexibility valuable. Otherwise PostgreSQL.
For new applications: PostgreSQL. More powerful and future-proof. Easy migration path to specialized databases later.
Conclusion
No database is universally “best”—the right choice depends on your specific requirements. Consider:
- Data structure complexity
- Scalability requirements
- Query patterns
- Team expertise
- Long-term growth plans
Start with proven open-source options (PostgreSQL or MySQL), and migrate to specialized solutions only when justified by specific requirements.